Friday, September 21, 2012

Freedom of Expression, Political Depression or Conspiracy ? Protests against Anti Islamic movie turning into Mob Behavior and Violence in Pakistan

Aazadi Fateh Muhammad - Pakistan

Pakistani nation strongly rejects defamatory attacks on the profile of Prophet of Islam Muhammad (Peace be Upon Him) in the name of freedom of expression when the movie trailer ‘Innocence of Muslims ', triggered intensive protests and anger in Pakistan after Egypt, Libya and Yemen. Public protests began across the country starting from a rally launched by Majlis e Wehdat ul Muslimeeen in front of US Consulate building in Karachi, last Saturday. Police used warning shots and tear gas to disperse the participants of the rally against the anti-Islamic movie resulting in 1 killing and 6 injuries.

Soon after this, number of demonstrations took place in Karachi city and across the country by various religious - political parties and civil society to condemn the blasphemous movie mocking the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him). In Karachi only, 1 killed and 8 people injured; two police vans set on fire when these protests turned violent and formed clashes with Police and law and order personnel.
The government of Islamic Republic of Pakistan is the first Muslim state in the region to announce a public holiday on September 21 and banned the web portal across the country to mark the protest against the film. However these steps did not do much to calm down the aggression and public protests as on Thursday evening biggest hike and violent protest was observed, when more than 3000 people gathered in Islamabad tried to enter in diplomatic enclave area consisting government official buildings and embassies of US, France and other countries leaving at least 15 injured.
Earlier in the week, the city witnessed the worst industrial fire in the history of Pakistan on September 12 when almost 300 workers burnt to death in a garment factory. Being in trouble all the time, the society not only suffers floods and natural disasters but also crime and terrorism. Target killings, political riots and call for strikes are part of routine life here. With nearly 40 million people living below poverty line, 60 percent of population illiterate, increasing terror, insecurity and unemployment left the nation depress and hopeless. Erfan Aziz a senior academician from Karachi expressing his remarks for public culture said that, ‘Public in Pakistan has remained much oppressed in the past. Even the genuine issues of society were not allowed to be discussed in public. You’ll still see messages such as SYASI GUFGTOO SE PERHEZ KAREN (Avoid Political Conversations) in some public restaurants and places.  He believes that with the Private media working in line with popular-Islam-loving set of people and ideology, the show of aggression and violence has attracted tremendous value in the society.’  
  In this scenario the news of anti-Islamic movie received immense anger and condemnation by the folks at all public platforms including social media, mobile messages (SMS), wall chalking and crowd marches, still the opinions regarding methods of protest may vary from one segment to another.
The Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) is most respectful and loved personality among Muslims. His flawless character and biography considered as an ideal way to follow to get a fruitful and ideal life. His immense impact on humanity and strong profile has been recognized not only by Muslims but non-Muslim communities in the world as well. Michael H. Heart included personality of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) as most influential person at top of the list in his book ‘100 Influential Persons’ in 1978. With the clear understanding, honor and status of him in the world, the content of movie seems an intentional insulting attempt and producer’s self-prejudice. 

The heterogeneous Pakistani society responded differently in their ways to protest against the controversial movie. Numbers of rallies by socio-political groups are on the go to mark the protest against the disrespectful movie. After religious parties, political segments, traders, lawyers, teachers, students, and members of minorities also joined Muslim communities in protest.
The major part of protest is based on marching rallies and enchanting slogans, but many academics and scholars believe in nonviolent actions depicting disapproval of the movie.
Narjis Fatima, a graduate student in University of Karachi suggested using vice-versa mediums to mark the protest on such offensive attacks on religion and society. She said ‘we should protest in similar terms by using cartoons, films or mass media to portray and register our disapproval with sufficient arguments and rationalizations. She forced on the idea of social tolerance and respect by conveying a message to the international community that we respect their beliefs and ideologies and expect them to do same for our faiths. Peaceful planned protests are necessary to show this respect and understanding among the world communities.
Pakistani youth must come up with creative ideas to register their feelings and hurt the movie did, thought by Kulsoom Shah a Pakistani Graduate and Fulbright scholar presently studying in USA.  She further explained the idea of unity and understanding among the Muslim Ummah around the world. She liked the way of protest in France where Muslim students distributed copies of Islamic holy book Quran in non-Muslim communities. She further added that with the support and consensus of International community the Film crew may be sued for the act of defamation.
There are serious concerns among the scholars of society on the ways to treat controversial messages avoiding violence and conflict. Responding to the question that how this situation may be positioned, Erfan Aziz firmly believe that a democratic government is bound to follow popular public sentiments. Yet on the other hand it has to guide its public to the sensible course of action in such situations.
Present situation is sensitive indeed and cannot be dealt in isolation. Islamic scholars of modest approach should be brought forward on the popular media to calm down people resentment, hard-liner political parties and public figures should not be allowed to use public space, and Government should address the situation at some reasonable and adequate forum so it can have its due impact.
Lindsey Boyle graduate and journalist from Ohio University strongly condemns the offense attempted by the movie and added that an overgeneralization is occurring. For one, the film does not represent popular U.S. opinion (partly, unfortunately, because many U.S. citizens do not even know who the Islam prophet is). Second, the U.S. government has condemned the movie, so burning the American flag is not necessarily a reasonable reaction. The problem with the freedom of speech we enjoy in the United States , a freedom that many nations wish they too enjoyed is that it applies to essentially all material, whether our government or citizens endorse it or not. I hope that Muslims throughout the world can understand that the film is not airing because all U.S. citizens believe it is true, but instead because the freedom of the media in the United States allows it to.

Answering the query about international community role and protests made by Muslims she said that the Muslim community should regarding a message to the rest of the world focus on debunking the myths of how the Islam prophet is portrayed in the film, as well as the incorrect portrayal of the religion itself. I know that is easier said than done. However, I believe there are many similarities between true Christianity's Jesus and Islam's Mohammed - they are both open-minded, they both help the weak, they both overcame struggle, and more. The biggest problem in the world today, religiously and culturally, is misunderstanding. People on both sides of this situation simply need to take time to learn about one another. That becomes almost impossible when one side is making an overgeneralized, demeaning movie, and the other side is violently protesting it in an overgeneralized way. We need to work to promote positive messages and understanding, above all else.
The question about nature of protest remains sensitive to answer, and far more difficult to motivate people to follow that in practical. Lindsey added her opinion that Peaceful protests that are truly peaceful are often effective. However, there is an almost inevitable challenge that comes with huge peaceful protests. When you bring a large body of unhappy people together in a small area to protest, the maintenance of peace can often become a problem.
 A large number of academicians and scholars strongly believe in peaceful protests, as violent and mob based protests not only will generate more violence and conflict but also make it easy to lose the true spirit of message and cause.
Lindsey Boyle is sure on the bases of her own knowledge of Christianity that violent aggressive protests may not be the way how a Prophet would also want the people to react in anyway.
The similarities in faith led to equal reactions around the Muslim regions and communities. The neighbor country Afghanistan witnessed same levels of angry and huge protests when they came to know about the movie. Taimoor Noorie senior journalist and academician from Kabul told that People responded critically against that depiction of Muhammad (peace be Upon him) at provincial and capital level and series of demonstrations still on the way through all Afghanistan, in Kabul the protest turn to violence which resulted  20 police men injured and dozens of civilians also have inflicted injuries. Universities students protested by burning the flag of United States, chanting slogans They demands the culprits should bring before justice. The clerics, tribal elders and civil activists hold meeting and condemned the action seriously and asked the USA Officials to take the halt such depiction which damage the relationship being created, they said it only generate hatreds towards Americans and benefits those who wage war against them.

In any society of the world Human diversity and pluralism must be understood to promote peace and prosperity. Present world is in a subtle need of Peace and Harmony, by showing tolerance and giving space to each other’s differences like color, race, creed, religion or country we can promote a more genuine and friendly life around us. Educational Institutions and Mass media must play their roles in promoting world knowledge and obvious presence of difference, which may be accepted as a law of nature rather than seen as reason of clash or hatred.


Fateh Muhammad said...

AAzadi it is a good effort, keep it up,yes we need a world where every one must respect the beliefs of every one, freedom of expression does not mean to hurt other people, and why always misused against Muslims only? if they have courage they should allow to talk against basic beliefs of Jews? or against other communities? We need international law for the protection of dignity and honor of all religious personalities including ours.

Irfan Aziz said...

The youtube is full of anti-everything. One may find very disgusting videos about Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Budhs etcs. But the way Muslims respond to this is unique. Blasphemy may be a personal feeling. One may feel it while other may not. On the other hand Defamation is very much provable. Muslims should frame the issue as Defamation of the Prophet and should come forward in the courts of law. If they can organize such show of anger and display of of the muslim lawyers should come forward and frame the issue as defamation against the director who is already under custody.